#Offset father of 4 stream code#

Cole spits his special brand of lyrical fire on “How Did I Get Here” and CeeLo adds some amazingly smooth vocals to “North Star”. Both of them add their unique sounds to this project and help to sonically expand the album beyond the trap sound we are used to from the Migos.

Two of the features on the album also surprised me: J. This was subject matter that I didn’t expect from Offset and I was pleasantly surprised he was willing to open up. He goes on to name all of his children and speak on his relationships with their mothers. Within the first track he opens up about having his first child at age 17. Firstly, I was amongst the group of people who wasn’t aware that Offset has four children. This is also why Offset gets called to feature on other projects fairly often. His rapping ability makes him the one member of the Migos that I could see potentially having a solo career. Since I already felt this way, it didn’t shock me that Offset’s album was by far the best of the group. Takeoff is a close second and Quavo is firmly in last although he makes up for this with his melodic hooks. I strongly feel that Offset is the best rapper of the three Migos and I’ve felt this for a while. Now it’s Offset’s turn with his album “FATHER OF 4”. Quavo’s project was a bit underwhelming and Takeoff’s project showed that he is an underrated member of the group. Next was Takeoff with his album “The Last Rocket”. Quavo went first and released his album “QUAVO HUNCHO”. You can make it more memory efficient but you'll have to sacrifice speed.In 2018, the Migos announced that they would each be releasing a solo project. This causes you to open the file multiple times but gets rid of the need for synchronization.

#Offset father of 4 stream code#

This code posts offsets to a CCR port which causes a Thread to be created to execute the code in the Split method. If (offset + split_size <= reader.Length)įile.WriteAllBytes('c:\out' + offset + '.txt', buff) static void Main(string args)ĭispatcherQueue dq = new DispatcherQueue('DQ', dp) Īrbiter.Activate(dq, Arbiter.Receive(true, offsetPort,įileStream fs = File.Open(file_path, FileMode.Open) įor (long i = 0 i < size i += split_size)įileStream reader = new FileStream(file_path, FileMode.Open, Have you considered using the CCR since you are writing to separate files you can do everything in parallel (read and write) and the CCR makes it very easy to do this. Also, if you're writing very small files, you may want to optimise for that situation too - the easiest way to do that would probably be to introduce a BufferedStream wrapping the input stream. If you need to skip bits of the file, you can do that from outside the method. This assumes contiguous chunks, of course. I think it'll be significantly faster, but obviously you'll need to try it to see. The important point is that this will use the operating system file buffering more efficiently, because you reuse the same input stream, instead of reopening the file at the beginning and then seeking. Note that this also closes the output stream (due to the using statement) which your original code didn't.

This has a minor inefficiency in creating a buffer on each invocation - you might want to create the buffer once and pass that into the method as well: public static void CopySection(Stream input, string targetFile, An alternative would be to throw an exceptionīytesRead = input.Read(buffer, 0, Math.Min(length, buffer.Length)) This will finish silently if we couldn't read 'length' bytes. Using (Stream output = File.OpenWrite(targetFile)) If you're just splitting up the file, why not open the input file once, and then just write something like: public static void CopySection(Stream input, string targetFile, int length) However, it strikes me that this is inefficient anyway, as it needs to open the input file and seek many times. NET to allow copying a section of a file without buffering it in memory.